Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Peter Kobelt vs Ben Patael Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kobelt vs Patael analysis and find out who is favored!
Peter Kobelt vs Ben Patael Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kobelt 1 - 1 Patael
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kobelt has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Patael has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kobelt, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Patael has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kobelt has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Patael has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kobelt has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Patael winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kobelt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 158/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Patael has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 212/ 133), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kobelt winning 1 times and Patael being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kobelt winning 2 and Patael winning 2. The last match between Kobelt and Patael was at the Israel F8 (Tel Aviv), 07-06-2018, Quarterfinals, Hard with Peter Kobelt getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:50:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kobelt and Patael have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kobelt winning 0 times and Patael 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kobelt winning 0, and Patael 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kobelt has played against opponents with an average rank of while Patael has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kobelt has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Patael has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kobelt has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Patael has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
332
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
809
Rank
379
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
62% (216-131)
Career Total W/L
59% (256-181)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Peter Kobelt vs Ben Patael For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kobelt VS Patael
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Peter Kobelt | Ben Patael |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 19 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:50:30 | 0:50:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (37/66) | 61% (35/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (31/37) | 66% (23/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (12/29) | 59% (13/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (21/57) | 35% (23/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Peter Kobelt
Player
Ben Patael
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
12
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Peter Kobelt | Ben Patael |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Peter Kobelt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Ribeiro Marcondes
Player
Peter Kobelt
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(4) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Peter Kobelt
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Uisung Park
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
67 of
117)
13
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
117)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(10) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Sean Hodkin
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Alexandar Lazarov
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(2) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexandar Lazarov
Player
Peter Kobelt
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Uisung Park
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
9
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Schott
Player
Peter Kobelt
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
2
Aces
23
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
23 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Brugnerotto
Player
Peter Kobelt
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
10
Aces
13
8
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
105
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ben Patael Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Ben Patael
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Ben Patael
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Joshua Luck
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Ben Patael
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Jonathan Baron
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Ben Patael
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ben Patael
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Ben Patael
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Shivank Bhatnagar
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Ben Patael
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Kobelt Vs Patael Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kobelt are available here and Patael photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
